The join expression conjecture for intersections of Verma modules

Let (W,S)(W,S) be a Weyl group with Bruhat order. For wWw\in W, let JM(w)\mathbf{JM}(w) be the distinguished set of Bruhat-maximal join-irreducible elements whose join is ww, and let Δw\Delta_w denote the corresponding Verma submodule of the antidominant Verma module Δe\Delta_e. Join expression conjecture. For each wWw\in W, we have

Δw=xJM(w)Δx,\Delta_w=\bigcap_{x\in\mathbf{JM}(w)}\Delta_x,

where the intersection is taken inside the ungraded module Δe\Delta_e. The statement is known in type AA, while examples in type E6E_6 show that the analogous assertion for arbitrary join expressions can fail; the conjecture concerns the distinguished expression JM(w)\mathbf{JM}(w) and remains open in general.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Hankyung Ko, Volodymyr Mazorchuk and Rafael Mrđen, “Join operation for the Bruhat order and Verma modules”, arXiv:2109.01067 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.