Non-Archimedean regularization conjecture for entropy and energy

From papers

Let XNAX_{NA} be the non-Archimedean analytification, let E1(XNA)\mathcal{E}^{1}(X_{NA}) be the finite-energy space, let H(XNA)\mathcal{H}(X_{NA}) be the space of non-Archimedean model potentials, and let MAMA denote the non-Archimedean Monge–Ampère operator. For uE1(XNA)u\in\mathcal{E}^{1}(X_{NA}), write ENA(MA(u))E_{NA}(MA(u)) and EntNA(MA(u))\operatorname{Ent}_{NA}(MA(u)) for its non-Archimedean energy and entropy. Non-Archimedean regularization conjecture. Given any uE1(XNA)u\in\mathcal{E}^{1}(X_{NA}), there exists a sequence ujH(XNA)u_j\in\mathcal{H}(X_{NA}) converging weakly to uu such that

ENA(MA(uj))ENA(MA(u)),EntNA(MA(uj))EntNA(MA(u)).E_{NA}(MA(u_j))\to E_{NA}(MA(u)),\qquad \operatorname{Ent}_{NA}(MA(u_j))\to \operatorname{Ent}_{NA}(MA(u)).

Such a regularization would provide the non-Archimedean analogue of the regularization property used in the variational Yau–Tian–Donaldson argument; the source presents it as a statement to be proved and gives no resolution.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Robert J. Berman, “Emergent complex geometry”, arXiv:2109.00307 (2021).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.