Non-Archimedean regularization conjecture for entropy and energy

About 5 years old · traced to

Let XNAX_{NA} be the non-Archimedean analytification, let E1(XNA)\mathcal{E}^{1}(X_{NA}) be the finite-energy space, let H(XNA)\mathcal{H}(X_{NA}) be the space of non-Archimedean model potentials, and let MAMA denote the non-Archimedean Monge–Ampère operator. For u∈E1(XNA)u\in\mathcal{E}^{1}(X_{NA}), write ENA(MA(u))E_{NA}(MA(u)) and Ent⁡NA(MA(u))\operatorname{Ent}_{NA}(MA(u)) for its non-Archimedean energy and entropy. Non-Archimedean regularization conjecture. Given any u∈E1(XNA)u\in\mathcal{E}^{1}(X_{NA}), there exists a sequence uj∈H(XNA)u_j\in\mathcal{H}(X_{NA}) converging weakly to uu such that

ENA(MA(uj))→ENA(MA(u)),Ent⁡NA(MA(uj))→Ent⁡NA(MA(u)).E_{NA}(MA(u_j))\to E_{NA}(MA(u)),\qquad \operatorname{Ent}_{NA}(MA(u_j))\to \operatorname{Ent}_{NA}(MA(u)).

Such a regularization would provide the non-Archimedean analogue of the regularization property used in the variational Yau–Tian–Donaldson argument; the source presents it as a statement to be proved and gives no resolution.

References

Primary source

Robert J. Berman, “Emergent complex geometry”, arXiv:2109.00307 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.