The 1-2-3 Conjecture for sum-proper edge-labellings

About 5 years old · traced to

Let GG be a graph. A graph is nice if none of its connected components is isomorphic to K2K_2, and let χS(G)\chi_{\rm S}(G) be the smallest k≥1k\geq 1 for which GG has an s-proper kk-labelling, meaning an edge-labelling from {1,…,k}\{1,\dots,k\} whose incident-label sums give different values at the ends of every edge.

The 1-2-3 Conjecture. If GG is a nice graph, then

χS(G)≤3.\chi_{\rm S}(G)\leq 3.

This is the original sum version of the 1-2-3 Conjecture, raised by Karoński, Łuczak and Thomason. The paper identified by the source is a proof of this conjecture, so the claim is solved.

References

Primary source

Julien Bensmail, Hervé Hocquard, Dimitri Lajou and Éric Sopena, “A proof of the Multiplicative 1-2-3 Conjecture”, arXiv:2108.10554 (2022).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A paper claims to prove the conjecture for all eligible graphs, but the retrieved material contains no independent verification.

Posed by Karoński, Łuczak, and Thomason in 2004, the conjecture asserts that every nice graph has an edge-labelling with labels 1,2,31,2,3 giving different incident-label sums at adjacent vertices.

Known results

  • Every nice graph was known to satisfy χS(G)≤5\chi_{\rm S}(G)\leq 5 by 2010.
  • The conjecture was proved for graphs of maximum average degree less than 8/38/3 (2013).
  • Three labels suffice when the minimum degree satisfies δ≥Clog⁡Δ\delta\geq C\log\Delta.
  • Bensmail, Fioravantes, and Mc Inerney (2021) proved that arbitrarily many edges labelled 33 may be necessary and studied the associated decision problem.

Claimed solution (date not stated)

The paper A Solution to the 1-2-3 Conjecture claims constructively that every graph with no component isomorphic to K2K_2 admits such a {1,2,3}\{1,2,3\}-labelling. A later source attributes a full solution to Keusch, but the retrieved material provides no independent verification or resolved proof audit.

Current status (as of September 2026): A complete proof is claimed by Keusch and in A Solution to the 1-2-3 Conjecture, while the retrieved evidence does not independently verify it.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.