Maximal wave front partition conjecture for negative representations
Maximal wave front partition conjecture for negative representations
Let be one of the split classical groups in the source, and let be a negative representation of . Suppose
For or , write
For , write instead
Maximal wave front partition conjecture. If or , then
\frak{p}^m(\sigma_{\neg})=\left\\{\eta_{\frak{g}_{n^*}^\vee,\frak{g}_{n^*}}\left(\left[(\prod_{j=1}^t n_j^2)(\prod_{i=1}^l(2m_i+1)\prod_{s=1}^k(2n_s+1))\right]\right)\right\\}.If , then
\frak{p}^m(\sigma_{\neg})=\left\\{\eta_{\frak{g}_{n^*}^\vee,\frak{g}_{n^*}}\left(\left[(\prod_{j=1}^t n_j^2)(\prod_{i=1}^l(2m_i)\prod_{s=1}^k(2n_s))\right]\right)\right\\}.Here is the duality map between partitions for the dual and original classical Lie algebras, and denotes the partition notation used in the source. This conjecture predicts the unique maximal wave front partition of a negative representation from its Jordan data; its status is not resolved in the supplied source.
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Dihua Jiang and Baiying Liu, “On Wave Front Sets of Global Arthur Packets of Classical Groups: Upper Bound”, arXiv:2107.14429 (2021).
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.