Cyclic decomposition conjecture for Whittaker-induced modules

Let g \mathfrak{g} be the Lie algebra under consideration, let Z(g) Z(\mathfrak{g}) be its center, and let UU be a finite-dimensional Z(g)Z(\mathfrak{g})-module. Let Iη(U)I_\eta(U) denote the corresponding Whittaker-induced module. Cyclic decomposition conjecture. Every finite-dimensional Z(g)Z(\mathfrak{g})-module is isomorphic to a direct \sum of cyclic Z(g)Z(\mathfrak{g})-modules. Moreover, every module of the form Iη(U)I_\eta(U) is isomorphic to a direct \sum of cyclic U(g)U(\mathfrak{g})-modules. The source itself flags the assertion as probably false because Z(g)Z(\mathfrak{g}) is not a principal ideal domain when the rank of g \mathfrak{g} exceeds one, so its status should be checked as a likely refutation rather than treated as established.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Adam Brown and Anna Romanov, “Contravariant pairings between standard Whittaker modules and Verma modules”, arXiv:2106.10029 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.