Gutt–Hutchings consistency conjecture for capacities of star-shaped domains

About 5 years old · traced to

Let UU be a bounded star-shaped domain, and let ckEH(U)c_k^{\text{EH}}(U), ckGH(U)c_k^{\text{GH}}(U), and ck(U)c_k(U) denote the Ekeland–Hofer, Gutt–Hutchings, and capacities considered in the paper, respectively. For every k∈Z≥1k\in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 1}, Gutt–Hutchings' conjecture.

ckEH(U)=ckGH(U)=ck(U).c_k^{\text{EH}}(U)=c_k^{\text{GH}}(U)=c_k(U).

The equality of the first two capacities is conjectured by Gutt and Hutchings for bounded star-shaped domains. The case k=1k=1, namely equality with the minimal action, is known for convex bodies, while the consistency for all kk remains open in the stated generality.

References

Primary source

Bingyu Zhang, “Capacities from the Chiu-Tamarkin complex”, arXiv:2103.05143 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.