The prime-power repair-factor conjecture for Stirling sequences

From papers

Let Sk(2)S^{(2)}_k denote the relevant sequence and let Fail(Sk(2)){\rm Fail}(S^{(2)}_k) be its repair factor. For a prime pp and a positive integer jj, the following assertions are conjectured. The prime-power repair-factor conjecture.

  • If j=1j=1, then
Fail(Sp+1(2))=pFail(Sp(2)).{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_{p+1}\bigr)=p\cdot{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_p\bigr).
  • If j>1j>1, then
Fail(Spj+1(2))pj1Fail(Spj(2)).{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_{p^j+1}\bigr)\mid p^{j-1}\cdot{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_{p^j}\bigr).
  • If j>1j>1, then
Fail(Spj(2))p=p1.\bigl|{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_{p^j}\bigr)\bigr|_p=p^{-1}.
  • We have
Fail(Spj+1(2))p=pj.\bigl|{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_{p^j+1}\bigr)\bigr|_p=p^{-j}.

These are the prime-power cases of the conjectural behavior of the repair factor and its pp-adic valuation. They, like the preceding conjectures, are motivated by numerical computations, while a general closed formula for the repair factor appears inaccessible.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Piotr Miska and Tom Ward, “Stirling number and periodic points”, arXiv:2102.07561 (2021).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.