The prime-power repair-factor conjecture for Stirling sequences

About 5 years old · traced to

Let Sk(2)S^{(2)}_k denote the relevant sequence and let Fail(Sk(2)){\rm Fail}(S^{(2)}_k) be its repair factor. For a prime pp and a positive integer jj, the following assertions are conjectured. The prime-power repair-factor conjecture.

  • If j=1j=1, then
Fail(Sp+1(2))=p⋅Fail(Sp(2)).{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_{p+1}\bigr)=p\cdot{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_p\bigr).
  • If j>1j>1, then
Fail(Spj+1(2))∣pj−1⋅Fail(Spj(2)).{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_{p^j+1}\bigr)\mid p^{j-1}\cdot{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_{p^j}\bigr).
  • If j>1j>1, then
∣Fail(Spj(2))∣p=p−1.\bigl|{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_{p^j}\bigr)\bigr|_p=p^{-1}.
  • We have
∣Fail(Spj+1(2))∣p=p−j.\bigl|{\rm Fail}\bigl(S^{(2)}_{p^j+1}\bigr)\bigr|_p=p^{-j}.

These are the prime-power cases of the conjectural behavior of the repair factor and its pp-adic valuation. They, like the preceding conjectures, are motivated by numerical computations, while a general closed formula for the repair factor appears inaccessible.

References

Primary source

Piotr Miska and Tom Ward, “Stirling number and periodic points”, arXiv:2102.07561 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.