Valuation conjectures for diskoids associated with abstract key polynomials

Let b[?]b[?] be a valuation and QQ an abstract key polynomial (ABKP) for b[?]b[?]. For an associated diskoid b[?](Q,b[?](Q))b[?](Q,b[?](Q)), let b[?]b[?](Q,b[?](Q))b[?]_{b[?](Q,b[?](Q))} denote the induced function on b[?][X]b[?][X]. An RT extension is the type of residually transcendental extension considered in the paper. Diskoid valuation conjectures. (C1) If QQ is an ABKP for b[?]b[?], then b[?]b[?](Q,b[?](Q))b[?]_{b[?](Q,b[?](Q))} is a valuation. (C2) If b[?]b[?] is an RT extension, then there is a unique diskoid DD such that

b[?]=b[?]D.b[?]=b[?]_D.

These conjectures seek, respectively, multiplicativity of the diskoid-induced function for abstract key polynomials and uniqueness of diskoid representation for RT extensions; the preceding counterexample shows that the analogous assertion does not hold for arbitrary diskoids.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Andrei Benguş-Lasnier, “Minimal Pairs, Truncations and Diskoids”, arXiv:2012.07780 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.