The Klemm–Pandharipande integrality conjecture for Calabi–Yau fourfolds

At least 7 years old · documented by

Let ZZ be a smooth projective complex Calabi–Yau variety of dimension four, let d∈H⁡2(Z,Z)d\in\operatorname{H}_2(Z,\mathbb{Z}), and let γ∈H⁡4(Z,Z)\gamma\in\operatorname{H}^4(Z,\mathbb{Z}). Define GW0,d;γ(Z)\mathrm{GW}_{0,d;\gamma}(Z) by the one-point genus-zero invariant and define KP0,d;γ(Z)\mathrm{KP}_{0,d;\gamma}(Z) through

GW0,d;γ(Z)=∑k∣dKP0,d/k;γ(Z)k2.\mathrm{GW}_{0,d;\gamma}(Z)=\sum_{k\mid d}\frac{\mathrm{KP}_{0,d/k;\gamma}(Z)}{k^2}.

Klemm–Pandharipande integrality conjecture.

KP0,d;γ(Z)∈Z.\mathrm{KP}_{0,d;\gamma}(Z)\in\mathbb{Z}.

This is the proposed higher-dimensional analogue of the Aspinwall–Morrison integrality prediction for rational curves. Its resolution is not stated in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Pierrick Bousseau, Andrea Brini and Michel van Garrel, “Stable maps to Looijenga pairs”, arXiv:2011.08830 (2021).

Additional references

3 papers in this index state this conjecture (2018–2020). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1902.00003, arXiv:1801.02513.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.