The Klemm–Pandharipande integrality conjecture for Calabi–Yau fourfolds

Let ZZ be a smooth projective complex Calabi–Yau variety of dimension four, let dH2(Z,Z)d\in\operatorname{H}_2(Z,\mathbb{Z}), and let γH4(Z,Z)\gamma\in\operatorname{H}^4(Z,\mathbb{Z}). Define GW0,d;γ(Z)\mathrm{GW}_{0,d;\gamma}(Z) by the one-point genus-zero invariant and define KP0,d;γ(Z)\mathrm{KP}_{0,d;\gamma}(Z) through

GW0,d;γ(Z)=kdKP0,d/k;γ(Z)k2.\mathrm{GW}_{0,d;\gamma}(Z)=\sum_{k\mid d}\frac{\mathrm{KP}_{0,d/k;\gamma}(Z)}{k^2}.

Klemm–Pandharipande integrality conjecture.

KP0,d;γ(Z)Z.\mathrm{KP}_{0,d;\gamma}(Z)\in\mathbb{Z}.

This is the proposed higher-dimensional analogue of the Aspinwall–Morrison integrality prediction for rational curves. Its resolution is not stated in the supplied text.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Pierrick Bousseau, Andrea Brini and Michel van Garrel, “Stable maps to Looijenga pairs”, arXiv:2011.08830 (2021).

Additional references

3 papers in this index state this conjecture (2018–2020). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1902.00003, arXiv:1801.02513.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.