Explicit formula for the shuffle-lattice interval polynomial
For integers , let be the shuffle poset, with rank function , and define
For , consider the case and . The interval-enumeration conjecture.
This explicit formula is proposed for the -triangle of the shuffle poset and can be verified for ; the source provides no resolution, so it remains open.
References
Primary source
Henri Mühle, “Hochschild lattices and shuffle lattices”, arXiv:2008.13247 (2021).
Progress summary
A reader-written argument claims a complete proof of the conjectured formula, but no independent verification of it was found.
The problem asks whether the proposed closed formula for the interval polynomial of the shuffle lattice holds for and , for all . The underlying shuffle-lattice framework appears in Mühle’s 2020 paper, but the formula itself is not resolved there.
Posted attempt
A complete proof is claimed for every , by partitioning intervals according to whether the distinguished letter occurs at each endpoint and summing the resulting contributions. The argument has not been independently verified, so this is a claimed solution rather than an established result.
Current status (as of August 2026): The formula is supported by a posted, unverified complete-proof claim; no independently corroborated proof or counterexample was found, so the problem remains mathematically open.
Sources
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
The interval polynomial of the one-letter shuffle lattice
Let and . A word in is a shuffle of a subword of with either the empty word or . The order is generated by deleting letters of and inserting the letter .
For comparable words , define
We prove the conjectured identity
for every .
For , the shuffle lattice is the two-element chain . Its three intervals give
which is also the value of the displayed expression, since its parenthesized factor is .
Now suppose , put , and write
If a shuffle word contains a subset and contains with indicator , then the source rank formula is
We partition all intervals according to the occurrence of at their two endpoints.
First suppose neither endpoint contains . If the lower word uses , then the upper word uses an arbitrary subset . Their total contribution is
Next suppose the lower endpoint does not contain , while the upper endpoint does. If the upper word uses a fixed -element subset , then has possible positions, and the lower subset may be any . Since the upper corank is , this contribution is
Finally suppose both endpoints contain . A lower word using an -element subset has possible positions for . Once such a word is fixed, every subset gives exactly one upper word: delete the letters of and retain in its induced position relative to the surviving letters. The contribution is therefore
Adding the three disjoint cases gives
because . This proves the conjecture in its full stated range.