The representability problem for the affine-plane Steiner system on nine vertices

About 6 years old · traced to

Let X2,9X_{2,9} be the simplicial complex whose missing faces form a Steiner (2,3,9)(2,3,9)-system, namely the lines of the affine plane of order 33.

Affine-plane representability problem. Determine whether

rep⁡(X2,9)≤5.\operatorname{rep}(X_{2,9})\leq 5.

The source presents this as a problem whose solution could provide a modest step toward the representability bound conjecture. No resolution is given in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Alan Lew, “Representability and boxicity of simplicial complexes”, arXiv:2008.09997 (2020).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A reader-submitted construction claims the five-dimensional representation exists, but no independent source has verified it.

Lew’s 2020 paper formulates the question whether the complex defined by the lines of the affine plane of order 33 satisfies rep⁡(X2,9)≤5\operatorname{rep}(X_{2,9})\leq 5, as a step toward a broader representability conjecture.

Known results

Lew, 2020: the preceding methods do not resolve rep⁡(X2,9)≤5\operatorname{rep}(X_{2,9})\leq 5; the related case X2,7X_{2,7} satisfies rep⁡(X2,7)≤4\operatorname{rep}(X_{2,7})\leq 4.

Community submission (unverified)

On August 26, 2026, a submitted proof argued that rep⁡(X2,9)≤5\operatorname{rep}(X_{2,9})\leq 5 by giving nine compact polytopes in R5\mathbb{R}^{5}, defined by integral affine inequalities, together with claimed witnesses for every line-free face. The supplied text does not establish that the certificate has been independently checked.

Current status (as of August 2026): the problem remains open in the published literature, while a five-dimensional construction has been submitted but is unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

This solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

MathDB #347688: a five-dimensional representation of X2,9X_{2,9}

Result

The answer is yes:

rep⁡(X2,9)≤5.\operatorname{rep}(X_{2,9})\le 5.

The representation is defined by integral affine inequalities and has integral witnesses for all faces.

Definition and convention

For a finite family C=(Cv)v∈V\mathcal C=(C_v)_{v\in V} of compact convex subsets of Rd\mathbb R^d, its nerve is

N(C)={S⊆V:⋂v∈SCv≠∅}.N(\mathcal C)=\{S\subseteq V:\bigcap_{v\in S}C_v\ne\varnothing\}.

The intersection indexed by the empty set is Rd\mathbb R^d, so the empty face is present. A simplicial complex is dd-representable if it is the nerve of such a family in Rd\mathbb R^d, and rep⁡(K)\operatorname{rep}(K) is the least such dd. This is the convention in Alan Lew, “Representability and boxicity of simplicial complexes,” arXiv:2008.09997, Conjecture 20 (published in Discrete & Computational Geometry 68 (2022), 592–607). Our representing sets are compact polytopes.

Identify the nine vertices with F32\mathbb F_3^2, in lexicographic order

0=(0,0),1=(0,1),2=(0,2),3=(1,0),4=(1,1),5=(1,2),6=(2,0),7=(2,1),8=(2,2).0=(0,0),1=(0,1),2=(0,2),3=(1,0),4=(1,1),5=(1,2), 6=(2,0),7=(2,1),8=(2,2).

The twelve affine lines, in the order used by the certificate, are

036,147,258;012,345,678;048,156,237;057,138,246.036,147,258;\quad012,345,678;\quad048,156,237;\quad057,138,246.

Thus

X2,9={S⊆{0,…,8}:S contains none of these lines}.X_{2,9}=\{S\subseteq\{0,\ldots,8\}:S\text{ contains none of these lines}\}.

The explicit construction

For every incident pair (L,v)(L,v), where LL is a line and v∈Lv\in L, the accompanying file certificate.json gives an integer row

aL,v=(a0,a1,…,a5).a_{L,v}=(a_0,a_1,\ldots,a_5).

It denotes the affine function

ℓL,v(x1,…,x5)=a0+∑i=15aixi.\ell_{L,v}(x_1,\ldots,x_5)=a_0+\sum_{i=1}^5a_i x_i.

Define nine compact convex polytopes by

Cv=[−42,42]5∩⋂L a line∈ˇL{x∈R5:ℓL,v(x)≥1}.(1)C_v=[-42,42]^5\cap \bigcap_{\substack{L\text{ a line}\v\in L}} \{x\in\mathbb R^5:\ell_{L,v}(x)\ge1\}. \tag{1}

The normals entry is aligned with the displayed lines entry: its i,ji,j row is the affine row for the jj-th point of the ii-th line. The witnesses entry maps each line-free four-set, written as a four-digit string, to an integral point of [−42,42]5[-42,42]^5.

Only the following exact checks about those integers are used.

  1. For each line L={p,q,r}L=\{p,q,r\}, the three affine rows have coordinatewise sum zero. Consequently ℓL,p+ℓL,q+ℓL,r=0\ell_{L,p}+\ell_{L,q}+\ell_{L,r}=0 identically.
  2. The witness keys are exactly all line-free four-subsets of {0,…,8}\{0,\ldots,8\} (there are 54 of them).
  3. If FF is one of these four-sets and yFy_F its witness, then yF∈[−42,42]5y_F\in[-42,42]^5 and ℓL,v(yF)≥1\ell_{L,v}(y_F)\ge1 for every v∈Fv\in F and every line L∋vL\ni v.

These are integer equalities and inequalities. The verifier reconstructs the affine-plane lines and the 54 four-caps independently, and checks all of them. In fact the smallest left side in item 3 is 50, so there is no issue of numerical tolerance.

Completeness of the four-cap witnesses

A line-free set in AG(2,3)AG(2,3) has at most four points. Indeed, suppose five points contained no line. In each of the four parallel classes, their occupancies on the three lines would have to be (2,2,1)(2,2,1), and hence that parallel class would account for two pairs of the five points. Every pair of points has exactly one direction, so the four classes would account for only 4⋅2=84\cdot2=8 pairs, whereas five points have (52)=10\binom52=10 pairs.

Moreover, every line-free set is contained in a line-free four-set. For a line-free triple, the third points on its three pair-lines are distinct; any of the other three points extends the triple to a four-set with no line. A line-free set of size at most two can first be extended to a noncollinear triple. (The verifier also checks this containment directly for every one of the 292^9 subsets.)

Proof that the nerve is exactly X2,9X_{2,9}

Let SS contain an affine line L={p,q,r}L=\{p,q,r\}. If some point xx belonged to every CvC_v, v∈Sv\in S, then (1) would give

ℓL,p(x),ℓL,q(x),ℓL,r(x)≥1.\ell_{L,p}(x),\ell_{L,q}(x),\ell_{L,r}(x)\ge1.

Their sum is identically zero, a contradiction. Hence every nonface of X2,9X_{2,9} has empty intersection in the constructed family.

Conversely, let SS contain no line. By the preceding paragraph choose a line-free four-set F⊇SF\supseteq S. The certificate point yFy_F satisfies all defining inequalities of CvC_v for every v∈Fv\in F, as well as the box constraints. Thus

yF∈⋂v∈FCv⊆⋂v∈SCv,y_F\in\bigcap_{v\in F}C_v\subseteq\bigcap_{v\in S}C_v,

so SS is a face of the nerve. Therefore

N(C0,…,C8)=X2,9,N(C_0,\ldots,C_8)=X_{2,9},

and the nine polytopes (1) prove rep⁡(X2,9)≤5\operatorname{rep}(X_{2,9})\le5.

Exact audit

Run

python verify_representation.py

from this directory. The verifier uses only the Python standard library, integer arithmetic, and constant-size data. It does not invoke an LP solver or make floating-point feasibility decisions. It checks the certificate schema, the affine-plane incidence structure, all line row-sums, all 54 cap witnesses and their incident inequalities, and a certificate of the correct answer for each of all 512512 vertex subsets. The pinned SHA-256 hashes are

certificate.json         db557b4c51e033d699eece7478bcc155dad7f36165163c9e8f0b218366e64981
verify_representation.py 32c3ec8576beb538ec29b06fa016b63431ce5c11a83c5fca65ac339746084cfe

The archived output is in verification.out.

Scope

This construction proves the requested upper bound only. It does not claim that five is the minimum representation dimension of X2,9X_{2,9}.

Lean: https://github.com/antoshashakov/Principia-Math-In-Progress/blob/main/mathdb-open-problems/problems/347688/Problem347688.lean

Solved by the Principia Math harness. Check out our work at principia-math.com

Models used: GPT 5.6 Sol, Fable