Zero-of-complete-symmetric-polynomial conjecture

About 6 years old · traced to

Let Fq\mathbb{F}_q be a finite field, let 3≤k≤q−23\leq k\leq q-2 (or 4≤k≤q−34\leq k\leq q-3 if qq is even), and let he(x1,…,xk)h_e(x_1,\ldots,x_k) denote the complete symmetric polynomial of degree ee. For coefficients a0,…,am∈Fqa_0,\ldots,a_m\in\mathbb{F}_q, set

h(x1,…,xk)=∑e=0maehe(x1,…,xk)h(x_1,\ldots,x_k)=\sum_{e=0}^m a_eh_e(x_1,\ldots,x_k)

and let Nq∗(h)N_q^*(h) count zeros of hh in Fqk\mathbb{F}_q^k with pairwise distinct coordinates. Zero-of-complete-symmetric-polynomial conjecture. For a complete symmetric polynomial hh of positive degree mm, Nq∗(h)≥1N_q^*(h)\geq 1 if and only if the reduction of

xk−1(∑e=0maexe)x^{k-1}\left(\sum_{e=0}^m a_ex^e\right)

modulo (xq−x)(x^q-x) is not a polynomial of degree k−1k-1.

The reduction condition is necessary, while the source identifies sufficiency as the difficult direction; no general resolution is given.

References

Primary source

Jun Zhang and Daqing Wan, “Rational points on complete symmetric hypersurfaces over finite fields”, arXiv:2007.11162 (2020).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

The conjecture remains unresolved, but it is proved in two substantial parameter ranges and no general proof or counterexample has been verified.

The conjecture asserts that the necessary reduction condition for a zero of a complete symmetric polynomial is also sufficient. The relevant paper leaves the general case open.

Known results

  • The reduction condition is necessary for all stated parameters.
  • The conjecture is proved when k≤pk\leq p, where q=prq=p^r.
  • It is also proved when k≥⌊(q+1)/2⌋k\geq\left\lfloor(q+1)/2\right\rfloor, within the stated admissible ranges.
  • In particular, the first range covers every admissible kk when qq is prime.

2024 journal article

A 2024 article titled “Zeros of Complete Symmetric Polynomials over Finite Fields” is directly relevant, but the available record does not establish whether it proves the full conjecture or only another partial case. No verified general proof, counterexample, or claimed AI solution was found.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture is settled in the ranges k≤pk\leq p and k≥⌊(q+1)/2⌋k\geq\left\lfloor(q+1)/2\right\rfloor, while the intermediate range remains open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.