The knot Floer homology and embedded contact homology correspondence conjecture

About 20 years old · traced to

Let K⊂MK\subset M be a null-homologous knot of genus gg. Let NN be the complement of an open tubular neighbourhood of KK, and let α\alpha be a contact form on NN for which ∂N\partial N is a negative Morse-Bott torus foliated by meridians of KK. For each integer ii, let ECHi♯(N,α)ECH^\sharp_i(N,\alpha) denote the homology of the subcomplex of ECH♯(N,α)ECH^\sharp(N,\alpha) generated by orbit sets in NN with total linking number ii with KK.

ECH–knot Floer correspondence conjecture. There is an isomorphism

ECHi♯(N,α)≅HFK^(M,K,i−g).ECH^\sharp_i(N,\alpha)\cong \widehat{HFK}(M,K,i-g).

This conjecture is obtained by combining the preceding sutured ECH–SFH conjecture with a theorem relating the relevant ECH groups and the relation between sutured Floer homology and knot Floer homology. Its resolution is not specified in the source.

References

Primary source

Paolo Ghiggini, Vincent Colin and Ko Honda, “An exposition of the equivalence of Heegaard Floer homology and embedded contact homology”, arXiv:2004.09626 (2020).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2006–2020). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:math/0601443.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.