Galatius--Venkatesh compatibility of derived Hecke actions

About 6 years old · traced to

Let KK be the level, let m\mathfrak m be the maximal ideal associated to π\pi, and let

v∈Hf1(Z[1S],Lie⁡Gˇ)∨,v∗∈Hf1(Z[1S],Lie⁡Gˇ),v\in H^1_f\left(\mathbb Z\left[\frac1S\right],\operatorname{Lie}\check{\mathrm G}\right)^\vee, \qquad v^*\in H^1_f\left(\mathbb Z\left[\frac1S\right],\operatorname{Lie}\check{\mathrm G}\right),

with f∈H∗(Y(K),E)mf\in H^*(Y(K),E)_\mathfrak m. Galatius--Venkatesh compatibility conjecture. The degree-raising and degree-lowering actions satisfy

v∗ ⁣(v.f)+v ⁣(v∗.f)=⟨v∗,v⟩ f.v^*\!\left(v.f\right)+v\!\left(v^*.f\right)=\langle v^*,v\rangle\,f.

This predicts compatibility between the derived Hecke action constructed in the paper and the action of Hansen and Thorne, under the smoothness assumption on the ordinary deformation ring.

References

Primary source

Chandrashekhar Khare and Niccolò Ronchetti, “Derived Hecke action at p and the ordinary p-adic cohomology of arithmetic manifolds”, arXiv:2004.06241 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.