Derived equivalence conjecture for the Lehn–Lehn–Sorger–van Straten eightfold

About 6 years old · traced to

Let YY be a cubic fourfold, let ZZ be its associated symplectic eightfold, and suppose that Y∈CdY\in\mathcal C_d for some dd satisfying the relevant condition. Then ZZ is isomorphic to a moduli space of Bridgeland-stable complexes on a K3 surface SS. Let α∈Br⁡(Z)\alpha\in\operatorname{Br}(Z) be the obstruction to the existence of a universal complex on Z×SZ\times S, and let U∈Db(Z×S,α⊠1)U\in D^b(Z\times S,\alpha\boxtimes 1) be a twisted universal complex. Since YY is naturally embedded in ZZ and Br⁡(Y)=0\operatorname{Br}(Y)=0, the restriction U∣Y×SU|_{Y\times S} can be untwisted. Derived equivalence conjecture. The functor A→Db(S)\mathcal A\to D^b(S) induced by U∣Y×SU|_{Y\times S} is an equivalence. This is an approach to proving that the Kuznetsov component A\mathcal A of the cubic fourfold is equivalent to the derived category of a K3 surface under the stated discriminant condition; the parser supplied no evidence resolving this conjecture.

References

Primary source

Nicolas Addington and Franco Giovenzana, “On the period of Lehn, Lehn, Sorger, and van Straten's symplectic eightfold”, arXiv:2003.10984 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.