Conjecture on removing assumptions from the uniqueness of Poincaré duality models

Let VV be a differential Poincaré duality algebra with \H^0(V)=\operatorname{Span}\{1\} and \H^1(V)=0, and let \Model1\Model_1 and \Model2\Model_2 be Poincaré duality models satisfying the hypotheses of Proposition 3.?? except for its additional assumptions. Uniqueness conjecture. The additional assumptions of the proposition can be removed, so \dIBL\MC(\CycC(\Model1))\dIBL^\MC(\CycC(\Model_1)) and \dIBL\MC(\CycC(\Model2))\dIBL^\MC(\CycC(\Model_2)) are \IBLInfty\IBLInfty-quasi-isomorphic. This would make the canonical construction independent of the auxiliary model under the basic hypotheses, but the source gives no resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Pavel Hajek, “IBL-Infinity Model of String Topology from Perturbative Chern-Simons Theory”, arXiv:2003.07933 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.