Arithmetic Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture in the Selmer rank one case

Assume the setup of the paper: Π0\Pi_0 and Π1\Pi_1 are the relevant representations under consideration, FF is the CM field, EE is their coefficient field, and the notation Vn\mathrm{V}_n, Λn\Lambda_n, Kn\mathrm{K}_n, Sh\operatorname{Sh}, ϕΠi\phi_{\Pi_i}, and the quotient Chow group is as in the statement. Arithmetic Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture. Suppose that

L(12,Π0×Π1)=0andL(12,Π0×Π1)0.L\left(\frac{1}{2},\Pi_0\times\Pi_1\right)=0\quad\text{and}\quad L'\left(\frac{1}{2},\Pi_0\times\Pi_1\right)\neq 0.

Then there exist a standard indefinite hermitian space Vn\mathrm{V}_n of rank nn over FF, a self-dual lattice Λn\Lambda_n, and an object (Kn,Kn+1)K(Vn)sp(\mathrm{K}_n,\mathrm{K}_{n+1})\in\mathfrak{K}(\mathrm{V}_n)_{\mathrm{sp}} with the specified local form, such that for every prime λ\lambda of EE, the graph Sh(Vn,Kn)\triangle\operatorname{Sh}(\mathrm{V}_n,\mathrm{K}_n) of the morphism

Sh(Vn,Kn)Sh(Vn+1,Kn+1)\operatorname{Sh}(\mathrm{V}_n,\mathrm{K}_n)\longrightarrow\operatorname{Sh}(\mathrm{V}_{n+1},\mathrm{K}_{n+1})

is nonvanishing in the stated quotient Chow group. This is presented as a weak version of the arithmetic Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture; the supplied passage gives no resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Yifeng Liu, Yichao Tian, Liang Xiao, Wei Zhang and Xinwen Zhu, “On the Beilinson-Bloch-Kato conjecture for Rankin-Selberg motives”, arXiv:1912.11942 (2021).

Additional references

3 papers in this index state this conjecture (2017–2019). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1808.07084, arXiv:1712.08844.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.