Base-change compatibility conjecture for automorphic \a3-invariants

Let E/FE/F be a solvable extension, let q\mathfrak{q} be a prime of EE above p\mathfrak{p}, and let πE\pi_E be the base-change lift of π\pi to PGLn,EPGL_{n,E}. Let pr ⁣:Homct(Eq×,Ω)Homct(Fp×,Ω)\operatorname{pr}\colon \operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{ct}}(E_{\mathfrak{q}}^{\times},\Omega)\to\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{ct}}(F_{\mathfrak{p}}^{\times},\Omega) be the canonical projection. Base-change compatibility conjecture. Under these assumptions,

Li(0)(πE,q)\mathbbm1=pr1(Li(0)(π,p)\mathbbm1).\mathcal{L}_{i}^{(0)}(\pi_E,\mathfrak{q})^{{\mathbbm 1}}=\operatorname{pr}^{-1}\bigl(\mathcal{L}_{i}^{(0)}(\pi,\mathfrak{p})^{{\mathbbm 1}}\bigr).

This predicts compatibility of automorphic L\mathcal{L}-invariants with solvable automorphic base change; the preceding Galois-equivariance results explain why the invariant over EE should descend to FF.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Lennart Gehrmann, “Automorphic L-invariants for reductive groups”, arXiv:1912.05209 (2021).

Additional references

3 papers in this index state this conjecture (2008–2019). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1701.01766, arXiv:0812.2519.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.