Conjecture on the structure of nearly holomorphic automorphic forms on SL2\mathrm{SL}_2

From papers

Let G=SL2G=\mathrm{SL}_2, let AA be the relevant split torus, let MM be a Levi subgroup, and let τ\tau be the representation used to define the induced automorphic data. Let N(A\G)(M,τ)\mathcal{N}(A \backslash G)_{(M,\tau)} denote the corresponding (M,τ)(M,\tau)-isotypic subspace of nearly holomorphic automorphic forms, let E0(M,τ)\mathcal{E}_0(M,\tau) be the space spanned by the regularized Eisenstein series constructed from E(M,τ)\mathcal{E}(M,\tau), and let Z\mathcal{Z} be the relevant center acting on N(A\G)\mathcal{N}(A \backslash G).

The conjecture. (1) N(A\G)(M,τ)E0(M,τ)\mathcal{N}(A \backslash G)_{(M,\tau)}\subset \mathcal{E}_0(M,\tau). (2) The action of Z\mathcal{Z} on N(A\G)\mathcal{N}(A \backslash G) is semisimple. (3) If N(A\G)(M,τ)0\mathcal{N}(A \backslash G)_{(M,\tau)}\neq 0, then the infinitesimal character of τ\tau is integral.

This conjecture proposes that the nearly holomorphic automorphic forms in each (M,τ)(M,\tau)-component are generated by the constructed Eisenstein series, with semisimple center action and an integrality constraint on the infinitesimal character. The supplied text does not state whether these assertions have been proved or disproved.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Shuji Horinaga, “Nearly holomorphic automorphic forms on SL_2”, arXiv:1912.04552 (2019).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.