Lefschetz decomposition conjecture for the congruence of lines and Peskine variety

Let A\mathsf{A} be the K3 category of the Debarre–Voisin hyperplane section YY, and let TT and PP be the associated congruence of lines and Peskine variety. Let U\mathcal{U} and Q\mathcal{Q} denote the bundles used in the construction, and write (1)(1) for tensoring with the relevant polarization. Improved Lefschetz decomposition conjecture. There should be a fully faithful functor Φ:ADb(T)\Phi:\mathsf{A}\to\operatorname{D}^b(T) such that

B=Φ(A),O,U,S2UDb(T)\mathsf{B}=\langle\Phi(\mathsf{A}),\mathcal{O},\mathcal{U}^*,S^2\mathcal{U}^*\rangle\subset\operatorname{D}^b(T)

provides

Db(T)=B,B(1),B(2).\operatorname{D}^b(T)=\langle\mathsf{B},\mathsf{B}(1),\mathsf{B}(2)\rangle.

There should also be a fully faithful functor Ψ:ADb(P)\Psi:\mathsf{A}\to\operatorname{D}^b(P) such that

C1=Ψ(A),OC0=Ψ(A),O,QDb(P)\mathsf{C}_1=\langle\Psi(\mathsf{A}),\mathcal{O}\rangle\subset\mathsf{C}_0=\langle\Psi(\mathsf{A}),\mathcal{O},\mathcal{Q}\rangle\subset\operatorname{D}^b(P)

provides

Db(P)=C0,C1(1),C1(2).\operatorname{D}^b(P)=\langle\mathsf{C}_0,\mathsf{C}_1(1),\mathsf{C}_1(2)\rangle.

These decompositions refine the expected three-copy K3 structures and use the exceptional collections constructed for TT and PP; the source gives no proof.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Marcello Bernardara, Enrico Fatighenti and Laurent Manivel, “Nested varieties of K3 type”, arXiv:1912.03144 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.