Geometric criterion for subrepresentation and irreducibility of parabolic induction

About 7 years old · traced to

Let m\mathfrak{m} and m′\mathfrak{m}' be multisegments satisfying the condition referred to in the source as

, and let $\operatorname{SA}(\mathfrak{m},\mathfrak{m}')$, $\operatorname{SG}(\mathfrak{m},\mathfrak{m}')$, and $\operatorname{IG}(\mathfrak{m},\mathfrak{m}')$ denote the source-defined algebraic and geometric conditions. **Geometric parabolic-induction conjecture.** Under condition

, (1) SA⁡(m,m′)\operatorname{SA}(\mathfrak{m},\mathfrak{m}') and SG⁡(m,m′)\operatorname{SG}(\mathfrak{m},\mathfrak{m}') are equivalent; and (2) Z(m)×Z(m′)Z(\mathfrak{m})\times Z(\mathfrak{m}') is irreducible if and only if IG⁡(m,m′)\operatorname{IG}(\mathfrak{m},\mathfrak{m}'). The conjecture connects representation-theoretic conditions for subrepresentation and irreducibility with geometric density conditions on commuting-variety components. Its general status is unresolved in the supplied source.

References

Primary source

Erez Lapid and Alberto Minguez, “Conjectures and results about parabolic induction of representations of GL_n(F)”, arXiv:1911.04281 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.