Equality of the relative and dual F-rational signatures

About 7 years old · traced to

Let (R,m)(R,\mathfrak m) be an F-rational local ring. Write srel⁡(R)\operatorname{s_{rel}}(R) for its relative F-rational signature and sdual⁡(R)\operatorname{s_{dual}}(R) for its dual F-rational signature. For an ideal generated by a system of parameters x‾\underline{x}, let e⁡HK(⟨x‾⟩)\operatorname{e}_{HK}(\langle\underline{x}\rangle) denote its Hilbert–Kunz multiplicity, and let ℓ(−)\ell(-) denote length. Equality conjecture. One has

srel⁡(R)=sdual⁡(R).\operatorname{s_{rel}}(R)=\operatorname{s_{dual}}(R).

Moreover, there exists a system of parameters x‾\underline{x} and an ideal JJ with x‾⊂J\underline{x}\subset J such that

sdual⁡(R)=e⁡HK(⟨x‾⟩)−e⁡HK(J)ℓ(R/⟨x‾⟩)−ℓ(R/J).\operatorname{s_{dual}}(R)=\frac{\operatorname{e}_{HK}(\langle\underline{x}\rangle)-\operatorname{e}_{HK}(J)}{\ell(R/\langle\underline{x}\rangle)-\ell(R/J)}.

The paper has already established that the relative, Cartier, dual, and ordinary F-signatures are related by a chain of inequalities, while examples show that the relative signature can differ from the rational signature. The conjecture asserts that the remaining invariants coincide in the F-rational local setting and gives a stronger formula for the dual signature.

References

Primary source

Ilya Smirnov and Kevin Tucker, “The theory of F-rational signature”, arXiv:1911.02642 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.