Sreekantan regulator factorization conjecture

Let XX be a variety over a local field KK with semistable reduction, and let \hmot(X,k+1,r)0\hmot(X,k+1,r)_0 be the relevant subgroup of motivic cohomology. Consider the composition

\hmot(X,k+1,r)0regHst1(K,Heˊtk(XKK,Qp(r)))H1(Cst(Heˊtk(XKK,Qp(r)))).\hmot(X,k+1,r)_0\xrightarrow{\operatorname{reg}}H_{\mathrm{st}}^1\left(K,H_{\mathrm{\acute et}}^k(X\otimes_K\overline{K},\mathbb{Q}_p(r))\right)\longrightarrow H^1\left(C_{\mathrm{st}}^{\bullet\prime}\left(H_{\mathrm{\acute et}}^k(X\otimes_K\overline{K},\mathbb{Q}_p(r))\right)\right).

Sreekantan regulator factorization conjecture. This composition factors via the Sreekantan regulator.

The conjecture is motivated by the relationship among the toric, syntomic, and Sreekantan regulators and does not require reduction hypotheses beyond semistability. No resolution is given in the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Amnon Besser and Wayne Raskind, “Toric regulators”, arXiv:1910.06877 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.