Mirabolic Iwahori-equivariant Satake conjecture

About 7 years old · traced to

Let V1V_1 and V2V_2 be NN-dimensional vector spaces, let \bI\bI be an Iwahori subgroup, and let \bFfli\bFfl_i be the variety of complete flags in ViV_i. Define the dg-scheme with zero differential

Hmir:=Hom⁡(V1,V2)[1]×Hom⁡(V2,V1)[1]×\bFfl1×\bFfl2.\boldsymbol{H}_{\mathrm{mir}}:=\operatorname{Hom}(V_1,V_2)[1]\times\operatorname{Hom}(V_2,V_1)[1]\times\bFfl_1\times\bFfl_2.

Writing AA and BB for the corresponding odd linear maps, define the mirabolic Steinberg scheme

Stmir={(A,B,F1,F2)∈Hmir∣AB(F2(j))⊆F2(j) and BA(F1(j))⊆F1(j), ∀j∈[1,N]}.\boldsymbol{St}_{\mathrm{mir}}=\{(A,B,F_1,F_2)\in\boldsymbol{H}_{\mathrm{mir}}\mid AB(F^{(j)}_2)\subseteq F^{(j)}_2\ \text{and}\ BA(F^{(j)}_1)\subseteq F^{(j)}_1,\ \forall j\in[1,N]\}.

Let \Fl=\bG\bF/\bI\Fl=\bG_\bF/\bI and let D\bI(\Fl×\bV)D_\bI(\Fl\times\bV) denote the \bI\bI-equivariant constructible derived category. Mirabolic Iwahori-equivariant Satake conjecture. There exists an equivalence of triangulated categories

DGL⁡(V1)×GL⁡(V2)Coh⁡(Stmir)≅D\bI(\Fl×\bV).D^{\operatorname{GL}(V_1)\times\operatorname{GL}(V_2)}\operatorname{Coh}(\boldsymbol{St}_{\mathrm{mir}})\cong D_\bI(\Fl\times\bV).

This is the proposed mirabolic counterpart of Bezrukavnikov's equivalence between the Iwahori-equivariant constructible derived category of the affine flag variety and an equivariant coherent-sheaf category on a dg Steinberg variety. Its status is not resolved in the source.

References

Primary source

Alexander Braverman, Michael Finkelberg, Victor Ginzburg and Roman Travkin, “Mirabolic Satake equivalence and supergroups”, arXiv:1909.11492 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.