Demailly–Green–Griffiths–Lang–Vojta equivalence conjecture

From papers

Let XX be a projective variety over a field kk of characteristic zero. The properties used below are algebraic hyperbolicity, boundedness, (n,m)(n,m)-boundedness for integers n,m1n,m\geq 1, having every integral closed subvariety of general type, and grouplessness.

Demailly–Green–Griffiths–Lang–Vojta conjecture. The following statements are equivalent: XX is algebraically hyperbolic over kk; XX is bounded over kk; for all n1n\geq 1 and m1m\geq 1, XX is (n,m)(n,m)-bounded over kk; every integral closed subvariety of XX is of general type; and XX is groupless over kk.

This conjecture unifies several expected characterisations of hyperbolicity and boundedness for projective varieties. The source presents it as evidence for conjectures of Demailly, Green–Griffiths, Lang, and Vojta, but gives no resolution in the stated generality.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Raymond van Bommel, Ariyan Javanpeykar and Ljudmila Kamenova, “Boundedness in families with applications to arithmetic hyperbolicity”, arXiv:1907.11225 (2023).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.