Universal optimality conjecture for lifted ETFs in the p-frame potential

Let d2d\geq 2. For each natural number kk with 1kd11\leq k\leq d-1, define

pk=log(k+2)logklog(k+1)logk.p_k=\frac{\log(k+2)-\log k}{\log(k+1)-\log k}.

Also define p0=0p_0=0. The configurations LkdL_k^d are the lifted ETF configurations in dimension dd, and FPp,d+1,d\operatorname{FP}_{p,d+1,d} denotes the pp-frame potential for d+1d+1 vectors in Rd\mathbb{R}^d.

Universal optimality conjecture for lifted ETFs. The following configurations minimize the pp-frame potential FPp,d+1,d\operatorname{FP}_{p,d+1,d}: when p(pk1,pk]p\in(p_{k-1},p_k], the LkdL_k^d configuration for k=1,2,,d1k=1,2,\ldots,d-1; and when p(pd1,]p\in(p_{d-1},\infty], the ETFd\operatorname{ETF}_d, or equivalently the LddL_d^d, configuration.

This conjecture proposes a complete sequence of minimizers as the parameter pp varies, explaining the numerical evidence that lifted ETFs are optimal configurations for the pp-frame potential. The supplied text gives no resolution, so its status remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Xuemei Chen, Victor Gonzales, Eric Goodman, Shujie Kang and Kasso Okoudjou, “Universal optimal configurations for the p-frame potentials”, arXiv:1902.03505 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.