Universal optimality conjecture for lifted ETFs in the p-frame potential

About 7 years old · traced to

Let d≥2d\geq 2. For each natural number kk with 1≤k≤d−11\leq k\leq d-1, define

pk=log⁡(k+2)−log⁡klog⁡(k+1)−log⁡k.p_k=\frac{\log(k+2)-\log k}{\log(k+1)-\log k}.

Also define p0=0p_0=0. The configurations LkdL_k^d are the lifted ETF configurations in dimension dd, and FP⁡p,d+1,d\operatorname{FP}_{p,d+1,d} denotes the pp-frame potential for d+1d+1 vectors in Rd\mathbb{R}^d.

Universal optimality conjecture for lifted ETFs. The following configurations minimize the pp-frame potential FP⁡p,d+1,d\operatorname{FP}_{p,d+1,d}: when p∈(pk−1,pk]p\in(p_{k-1},p_k], the LkdL_k^d configuration for k=1,2,…,d−1k=1,2,\ldots,d-1; and when p∈(pd−1,∞]p\in(p_{d-1},\infty], the ETF⁡d\operatorname{ETF}_d, or equivalently the LddL_d^d, configuration.

This conjecture proposes a complete sequence of minimizers as the parameter pp varies, explaining the numerical evidence that lifted ETFs are optimal configurations for the pp-frame potential. The supplied text gives no resolution, so its status remains open.

References

Primary source

Xuemei Chen, Victor Gonzales, Eric Goodman, Shujie Kang and Kasso Okoudjou, “Universal optimal configurations for the p-frame potentials”, arXiv:1902.03505 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.