Integral Prasanna–Venkatesh regulator relation for base change

Let ff be a normalized newform, FF the number field in the paper, and fFf_F its base change. Let u~2(fF)\widetilde{u}_2(f_F) be the normalized degree-two period quantity, Ωf+\Omega_f^+ and Ωf\Omega_f^- the periods of ff, and Rf,αR_{f,\alpha} the archimedean regulator. Assume p>2k1p>2k-1, (p,N)=1(p,N)=1, (Reg)p(\operatorname{Reg})_p holds, and (MinF)(\operatorname{Min}_F) holds. Integral Prasanna–Venkatesh regulator relation. One has

u~2(fF)Ωf+ΩfRf,α.\widetilde{u}_2(f_F)\sim \Omega_f^+\Omega_f^-\cdot R_{f,\alpha}.

The relation is presented as an integral version of the rational comparison conjectured by Prasanna and Venkatesh, identifying motivic cohomology with a Hom-space between base-change cohomology groups. The source does not state a resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jacques Tilouine and Eric Urban, “Integral period relations and congruences”, arXiv:1811.11166 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.