The q-Hahn PushTASEP Fredholm determinant conjecture

From papers

Let xn(t)x_n(t) denote the position of the nnth particle in the qq-Hahn PushTASEP started from the step initial configuration, and let (a;q)(a;q)_\infty denote the qq-Pochhammer symbol. For ζCR>0\zeta\in\mathbb{C}\setminus\mathbb{R}_{>0}, define KζK_\zeta as the integral operator on a small positively oriented circle around 11 with kernel

Kζ(w,w)=12π11+121+12πsin(πs)(ζ)sg(w)g(qsw)dsqsww,K_\zeta(w,w')=\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{-1}}\int_{-\infty\sqrt{-1}+\frac12}^{\infty\sqrt{-1}+\frac12}\frac{\pi}{\sin(-\pi s)}(-\zeta)^s\frac{g(w)}{g(q^s w)}\frac{ds}{q^s w-w'},

where

g(w)=((νw;q)(w;q))n((μw1;q)(νw1;q))t1(νw;q).g(w)=\left(\frac{(\nu w;q)_\infty}{(w;q)_\infty}\right)^n\left(\frac{(\mu w^{-1};q)_\infty}{(\nu w^{-1};q)_\infty}\right)^t\frac{1}{(\nu w;q)_\infty}.

The q-Hahn PushTASEP Fredholm determinant conjecture. For the step initial configuration,

E[1(ζqxn(t)+n;q)]=det(I+Kζ).\mathop{\mathbb{E}}\left[\frac{1}{(\zeta q^{x_n(t)+n};q)_\infty}\right]=\det(I+K_\zeta).

This conjecture gives a Fredholm determinantal formula for the eqe_q-Laplace transform of the single-particle position. The identity is proved rigorously when ν=0\nu=0; the general case is conjectural because only finitely many of the qq-moments are finite.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ivan Corwin, Konstantin Matveev and Leonid Petrov, “The q-Hahn PushTASEP”, arXiv:1811.06475 (2019).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.