The Calabi–Yau type conjecture for varieties with polarized endomorphisms

At least 9 years old · documented by

Let XX be a normal complex projective variety admitting a non-invertible polarized endomorphism.

Calabi–Yau type conjecture. Then XX is of Calabi–Yau type.

This is presented as another important conjecture concerning polarized endomorphisms. The supplied status evidence resolves it under the additional assumptions that XX is Q\mathbb{Q}-Gorenstein and the endomorphism is étale in codimension one; the general statement remains open.

References

Primary source

Shou Yoshikawa, “Singularities of non-Q-Gorenstein varieties admitting a polarized endomorphism”, arXiv:1811.01795 (2021).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2016–2018). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1607.01382.

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A recent unrefereed theorem advances the conjecture for a stronger class of self-maps, but the full statement remains open.

The conjecture asserts that every normal complex projective variety with a non-invertible polarized endomorphism is of Calabi–Yau type. The general claim is unresolved; known results cover several important special cases.

Known results

  • Broustet and Gongyo (2016): the conjecture holds for surfaces.
  • Yoshikawa (2021): if the endomorphism is étale in codimension one, then KXK_X is Q\mathbb{Q}-linearly trivial and XX is of Calabi–Yau type, without requiring XX to be Q\mathbb{Q}-Gorenstein.
  • The conjecture holds for smooth projective threefolds; a specific projective-bundle case remains unresolved.

October 2026 int-amplified advance

Shou Yoshikawa’s preprint Construction of log Calabi--Yau boundaries from int-amplified endomorphisms claims the Calabi–Yau-type conclusion under the stronger int-amplified-endomorphism hypothesis. This is claimed progress, not a resolution, and the preprint is unrefereed.

Current status (as of October 2026): The conjecture is proved in several special settings, including the étale-in-codimension-one case and smooth threefolds, while the general polarized-endomorphism statement remains open; the int-amplified extension is unverified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.