Precise pullback conjecture for local Langlands correspondences and Hecke algebras

Let f:G~Gf:\tilde{\mathcal G}\to\mathcal G satisfy Condition 1, and use the corresponding notion of relevance for enhanced L-parameters. Let ϕ~=Lf(ϕ)\tilde\phi={}^Lf(\phi), and denote by π(ϕ,ρ)\pi(\phi,\rho) the representation associated to (ϕ,ρ)(\phi,\rho).

Precise pullback conjecture. For every (ϕ,ρ)Φe(G)(\phi,\rho)\in\Phi_e(G),

f(π(ϕ,ρ))=ρ~Irr(Sϕ~)HomSϕ(ρ,Sf(ρ~))π(ϕ~,ρ~).f^*(\pi(\phi,\rho))=\bigoplus_{\tilde\rho\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal S_{\tilde\phi})}\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal S_\phi}\bigl(\rho,{}^Sf^*(\tilde\rho)\bigr)\otimes\pi(\tilde\phi,\tilde\rho).

This is a more precise version of the earlier local pullback conjecture and is intended to describe compatibility between local Langlands correspondences and pullback through the associated Hecke-algebra parametrizations. The source gives no resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Maarten Solleveld, “Langlands parameters, functoriality and Hecke algebras”, arXiv:1810.12693 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.