Fontaine–Jannsen semistable conjecture

Let KK be the underlying pp-adic field, let FF be the coefficient field of Hyodo–Kato cohomology, and let XX be a proper, log-smooth, fine and saturated OK×\mathcal{O}_K^{\times}-log-scheme with Cartier type reduction. Let Heˊti(XK,tr,Qp)H^i_{\operatorname{\acute{e}t}}(X_{\overline{K},\operatorname{tr}},\mathbf Q_p) denote the ii-th étale cohomology, HHKi(X)H^i_{\operatorname{HK}}(X) the Hyodo–Kato cohomology, HdRi(XK)H^i_{\operatorname{dR}}(X_K) the de Rham cohomology, and let Bst\mathbf B_{\operatorname{st}} and BdR\mathbf B_{\operatorname{dR}} be the semistable and de Rham period rings. Fontaine–Jannsen's semistable conjecture. There exists a natural Bst\mathbf B_{\operatorname{st}}-linear, Galois-equivariant period isomorphism

αi:Heˊti(XK,tr,Qp)QpBstHHKi(X)FBst\alpha_i:H^i_{\operatorname{\acute{e}t}}(X_{\overline{K},\operatorname{tr}},\mathbf Q_p)\otimes_{\mathbf Q_p}\mathbf B_{\operatorname{st}}\stackrel{\sim}{\to}H^i_{\operatorname{HK}}(X)\otimes_F\mathbf B_{\operatorname{st}}

that preserves the Frobenius and monodromy operators and whose extension to BdR\mathbf B_{\operatorname{dR}} induces a filtered isomorphism

αi:Heˊti(XK,tr,Qp)QpBdRHdRi(XK)KBdR.\alpha_i:H^i_{\operatorname{\acute{e}t}}(X_{\overline{K},\operatorname{tr}},\mathbf Q_p)\otimes_{\mathbf Q_p}\mathbf B_{\operatorname{dR}}\stackrel{\sim}{\to}H^i_{\operatorname{dR}}(X_K)\otimes_K\mathbf B_{\operatorname{dR}}.

This is the comparison conjecture relating étale, Hyodo–Kato, and de Rham cohomology for proper semistable logarithmic schemes; the supplied text does not state whether it has been resolved, so its database status is left open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Wiesława Nizioł, “On uniqueness of p-adic period morphisms, II”, arXiv:1804.03873 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.