Exact relation between the idempotent-sum-free constant and the Erdős–Burgess constant for cyclic semigroups

Let Ck;n{\rm C}_{k;n} be a cyclic commutative semigroup with parameters kk and nn, and let \sll^(Ck;n){\hat{\sl l}}({\rm C}_{k;n}) denote the threshold associated with idempotent-sum-free sequences, while \sll(Ck;n){\sl l}({\rm C}_{k;n}) denotes the Erdős–Burgess constant. The conjecture. For k>nk>n,

\sll^(Ck;n)=\sll(Ck;n)1.{\hat{\sl l}}({\rm C}_{k;n})={\sl l}({\rm C}_{k;n})-1.

The claim concerns the relationship between the auxiliary idempotent-sum-free threshold and the Erdős–Burgess constant in the cyclic case; the preceding discussion derives several exact formulas and bounds for particular parity cases, but this stated relation is not accompanied by a resolution in the supplied text.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Guoqing Wang, “Erdős-Burgess constant of commutative semigroups”, arXiv:1802.08791 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.