The BMM symmetrising trace conjecture for complex reflection groups

About 8 years old · traced to

Let WW be a complex reflection group with generic Hecke algebra H(W)\mathcal{H}(W) over Z[u,u−1]\mathbb{Z}[\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}^{-1}]. Let B(W)B(W) be its braid group, let π\boldsymbol{\pi} be the distinguished braid-group element used in the conjecture, and let β↦Tβ\beta\mapsto T_\beta be the natural surjection B(W)→H(W)B(W)\to\mathcal{H}(W). Let x↦x∗x\mapsto x^* be the automorphism of Z[u,u−1]\mathbb{Z}[\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}^{-1}] induced by u↦u−1\mathbf{u}\mapsto\mathbf{u}^{-1}. The BMM symmetrising trace conjecture. There exists a canonical symmetrising trace τ\tau on H(W)\mathcal{H}(W) such that: (1) τ\tau specialises to the canonical symmetrising trace on the group algebra of WW under uC,j↦ζeCju_{\mathcal{C},j}\mapsto\zeta_{e_{\mathcal{C}}}^{j}; and (2) for every β∈B(W)\beta\in B(W),

τ(Tβ−1)∗=τ(Tβπ)τ(Tπ).\tau(T_{\beta^{-1}})^*=\frac{\tau(T_{\beta\boldsymbol{\pi}})}{\tau(T_{\boldsymbol{\pi}})}.

The conjecture supplies a canonical trace with both the required group-algebra specialisation and duality condition. It is known for the infinite series G(l,p,n)G(l,p,n) only that a trace satisfying the first condition exists, while the full conjecture has been proved for G4G_4, G12G_{12}, G22G_{22} and G24G_{24}, and this paper proves it for G4,…,G8G_4,\ldots,G_8.

References

Primary source

Christina Boura, Eirini Chavli, Maria Chlouveraki and Konstantinos Karvounis, “The BMM symmetrising trace conjecture for groups G_4,\,G_5,\,G_6,\,G_7,\,G_8”, arXiv:1802.07482 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.