Harris's conjecture on Mantovan cohomology and supercuspidal representations

Let (G,μ)(G,\mu) be a local Shimura datum as in the source, let bB(G,μ)b\in\mathbf{B}(G,\mu), and let MSMbM_S\subset M_b be a standard Levi subgroup. Let ρ\rho be a supercuspidal representation in Groth(MS(Qp))\operatorname{Groth}(M_S(\mathbb{Q}_p)), let IMSMbI^{M_b}_{M_S} and IMSGI^G_{M_S} denote normalized parabolic induction, let LJLJ be the Jacquet–Langlands map, and let RelMS,bG,μ\mathrm{Rel}^{G,\mu}_{M_S,b} be the set of pairs defined by the stated conjugacy and Kottwitz-invariant conditions. For each pair, let rμSr_{-\mu_S} be the corresponding representation of MS^WE{μS}MS\widehat{M_S}\rtimes W_{E_{\{\mu_S\}_{M_S}}}. Harris's conjecture. The representations

MantG,b,μ(LJ(δG,Pb12IMSMb(ρ)))\mathrm{Mant}_{G,b,\mu}\bigl(LJ(\delta^{\frac{1}{2}}_{G,P_b}I^{M_b}_{M_S}(\rho))\bigr)

and

[IMSG(ρ)][(MS,μS)RelMS,bG,μrμSLL(ρ)WE{μS}MSρG,μ][I^G_{M_S}(\rho)]\left[\bigoplus_{(M_S,\mu_S)\in\mathrm{Rel}^{G,\mu}_{M_S,b}}r_{-\mu_S}\circ LL(\rho)|_{W_{E_{\{\mu_S\}_{M_S}}}}|\cdot|^{-\langle\rho_G,\mu\rangle}\right]

are equal in Groth(G(Qp)×WE{μ}G)\operatorname{Groth}(G(\mathbb{Q}_p)\times W_{E_{\{\mu\}_G}}). In particular, when bb is basic, the same equality holds with LJ(IMSG(ρ))LJ(I^G_{M_S}(\rho)) on the left and the corresponding displayed expression on the right. This is a proposed restatement and slight generalization of Harris's conjecture; the source does not report a proof or resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Alexander Bertoloni Meli, “The Cohomology of Unramified Rapoport-Zink Spaces of EL-type and Harris's Conjecture”, arXiv:1802.01629 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.