Kottwitz's Frobenius–Hecke trace conjecture for intersection cohomology

At least 7 years old · documented by

Let (G,X)(G,X) be a Shimura datum with reflex field EE, let K=KpKp⊂G(Af)K=K_pK^p\subset G(\mathbb A_f) be neat with KpK_p hyperspecial at a prime pp coprime to λ\lambda, and let Sh⁡K\operatorname{Sh}_K be the associated Shimura variety with Baily–Borel compactification Sh⁡K‾\overline{\operatorname{Sh}_K}. Let IH⁡∗\operatorname{\mathbf{IH}}^* be its intersection cohomology with coefficients in an automorphic λ\lambda-adic sheaf. The Hecke algebra H(G(Afp)//Kp)\mathcal H(G(\mathbb A_f^p)//K^p) and Gal⁡(Eˉ/E)\operatorname{Gal}(\bar E/E) act on IH⁡∗\operatorname{\mathbf{IH}}^*. Fix fp,∞f^{p,\infty} in this Hecke algebra, let Φ=Φp\Phi=\Phi_{\mathfrak p} be geometric Frobenius at a place p\mathfrak p above pp, and let a∈Z≥1a\in\mathbb Z_{\geq1}. For each elliptic endoscopic datum HH of GG, let fHf^H be the associated test function, ι(G,H)\iota(G,H) the endoscopic coefficient, and STHST^H the geometric side of the stable trace formula. Kottwitz's conjecture. The action of Gal⁡(Eˉ/E)\operatorname{Gal}(\bar E/E) on IH⁡∗\operatorname{\mathbf{IH}}^* is unramified at p\mathfrak p, and, under simplifying assumptions,

Tr⁡(fp,∞×Φa∣IH⁡∗)=∑Hι(G,H)STH(fH).\operatorname{Tr}(f^{p,\infty}\times\Phi^a\mid\operatorname{\mathbf{IH}}^*)=\sum_H\iota(G,H)ST^H(f^H).

This is the conjectural Langlands–Kottwitz comparison between Frobenius–Hecke traces on intersection cohomology and stable Arthur–Selberg trace formulas; the paper confirms it for orthogonal Shimura varieties.

References

Primary source

Yihang Zhu, “The stabilization of the Frobenius–Hecke traces on the intersection cohomology of orthogonal Shimura varieties”, arXiv:1801.09404 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.