Kottwitz's Frobenius–Hecke trace conjecture for intersection cohomology

From papers

Let (G,X)(G,X) be a Shimura datum with reflex field EE, let K=KpKpG(Af)K=K_pK^p\subset G(\mathbb A_f) be neat with KpK_p hyperspecial at a prime pp coprime to λ\lambda, and let ShK\operatorname{Sh}_K be the associated Shimura variety with Baily–Borel compactification ShK\overline{\operatorname{Sh}_K}. Let IH\operatorname{\mathbf{IH}}^* be its intersection cohomology with coefficients in an automorphic λ\lambda-adic sheaf. The Hecke algebra H(G(Afp)//Kp)\mathcal H(G(\mathbb A_f^p)//K^p) and Gal(Eˉ/E)\operatorname{Gal}(\bar E/E) act on IH\operatorname{\mathbf{IH}}^*. Fix fp,f^{p,\infty} in this Hecke algebra, let Φ=Φp\Phi=\Phi_{\mathfrak p} be geometric Frobenius at a place p\mathfrak p above pp, and let aZ1a\in\mathbb Z_{\geq1}. For each elliptic endoscopic datum HH of GG, let fHf^H be the associated test function, ι(G,H)\iota(G,H) the endoscopic coefficient, and STHST^H the geometric side of the stable trace formula. Kottwitz's conjecture. The action of Gal(Eˉ/E)\operatorname{Gal}(\bar E/E) on IH\operatorname{\mathbf{IH}}^* is unramified at p\mathfrak p, and, under simplifying assumptions,

Tr(fp,×ΦaIH)=Hι(G,H)STH(fH).\operatorname{Tr}(f^{p,\infty}\times\Phi^a\mid\operatorname{\mathbf{IH}}^*)=\sum_H\iota(G,H)ST^H(f^H).

This is the conjectural Langlands–Kottwitz comparison between Frobenius–Hecke traces on intersection cohomology and stable Arthur–Selberg trace formulas; the paper confirms it for orthogonal Shimura varieties.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Yihang Zhu, “The stabilization of the Frobenius–Hecke traces on the intersection cohomology of orthogonal Shimura varieties”, arXiv:1801.09404 (2023).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.