Cylinder conjecture for low-degree del Pezzo surfaces

About 9 years old · traced to

Let SS be a del Pezzo surface of anticanonical degree at most 22 with at worst Du~Val singularities. The affine Fano variety P∖S\mathbb{P}\setminus S is the complement of SS in the ambient projective variety, and a (−KS)(-K_S)-polar cylinder is an open cylinder in SS whose boundary is supported by an anticanonical divisor. Cylinder conjecture for low-degree del Pezzo surfaces. The affine Fano variety P∖S\mathbb{P}\setminus S contains an open A1\mathbb{A}^1-cylinder if and only if SS contains a (−KS)(-K_{S})-polar cylinder. The preceding discussion establishes the analogous equivalence for cubic surfaces, while the claim for anticanonical degrees at most 22 is presented as a natural expectation and remains unresolved in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Ivan Cheltsov, Adrien Dubouloz and Jihun Park, “Super-rigid Affine Fano Varieties”, arXiv:1712.09148 (2017).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

The exact equivalence remains open, while recent papers establish only closely related results about cylinders on the surface itself.

The conjecture, formulated in this broader form in 2015, asks whether an open A1\mathbb{A}^1-cylinder in the affine complement is equivalent to a (−KS)(-K_S)-polar cylinder on a low-degree del Pezzo surface; the cubic case is known.

Known results

  • Degree 22: a (−KS)(-K_S)-polar cylinder exists unless all singularities are of type A1A_1 (Cheltsov, Park, Won, 2013).
  • Degree 11: the listed exceptional configurations have singularities only of types A1A_1, A2A_2, A3A_3, or D4D_4 (Cheltsov, Park, Won, 2013).
  • A tiger criterion characterizes existence of (−KS)(-K_S)-polar cylinders (Cheltsov, Park, Won, 2018).
  • These results concern cylinders on SS, not the affine-complement equivalence.

December 2024--December 2025 related cylinder results

A December 2024 paper claims the ample-cylinder conjecture for Du Val del Pezzo surfaces of degree at least 22, including degree 22. A December 2025 paper claims the analogous result for degree-11 surfaces with Picard rank 22. These are claims about a neighboring surface formulation and do not explicitly prove the affine-Fano statement.

Current status (as of August 2026): The affine-complement equivalence remains unsettled; degree-22 and some degree-11 surface-cylinder statements are claimed, but their implication here is unverified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.