Ichino–Ikeda conjecture for Gan–Gross–Prasad periods

Let FF be a number field, let F=FF'=F in the orthogonal case and a quadratic extension of FF in the Hermitian case, and let Wn1WnW_{n-1}\subset W_n be as in the Gan–Gross–Prasad setting. Put G=Gn1×Gn{\mathrm {G}}={\mathrm {G}}_{n-1}\times {\mathrm {G}}_n and H=Gn1{\mathrm {H}}={\mathrm {G}}_{n-1}, with the diagonal embedding, and let π=vπv\pi=\bigotimes_v\pi_v be a tempered cuspidal automorphic representation. Normalize the local forms αv\alpha_v by

αv(ϕv,φv)=1L(12,πv)H(Fv)πv(h)ϕv,φvvdh.\alpha_v(\phi_v,\varphi_v)=\frac{1}{{\mathscr{L}}(\frac{1}{2},\pi_v)}\int_{{\mathrm {H}}(F_v)}\langle \pi_v(h)\phi_v,\varphi_v\rangle_v\,dh.

Ichino–Ikeda conjecture. For every pure tensor ϕ=vϕvπ\phi=\bigotimes_v\phi_v\in\pi,

PH(ϕ)2=2βπL(1/2,π)vαv(ϕv,ϕv),\left|{\mathscr{P}}_{\mathrm {H}}(\phi)\right|^2=2^{-\beta_\pi}{\mathscr{L}}(1/2,\pi)\prod_v\alpha_v(\phi_v,\phi_v),

where βπ\beta_\pi is the rank of the finite elementary 22-group associated to the LL-parameter of π\pi. This refines the global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture; it is known in several cases, including the stated Hermitian case under the hypotheses given later in the paper, but is not resolved in general.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Wei Zhang, “Periods, cycles, and L-functions: a relative trace formula approach”, arXiv:1712.08844 (2017).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2007–2017). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:0712.2092.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.