Huybrechts' K3 surfaces Hodge–motive–L-equivalence conjecture

About 9 years old · traced to

Let SS and S′S' be complex projective K3 surfaces. Write H2(S,Q)≅H2(S′,Q)H^2(S,\mathbb{Q})\cong H^2(S',\mathbb{Q}) for an isomorphism of rational Hodge structures, h(S)≅h(S′)\mathfrak h(S)\cong\mathfrak h(S') for an isomorphism of rational Chow motives, and let K0(Var⁡C)[L−1]K_0(\operatorname{Var}_{\mathbb{C}})[\mathbb{L}^{-1}] denote the localization of the Grothendieck ring of complex varieties by the affine-line class L\mathbb{L}. Huybrechts' conjecture. The following conditions are equivalent: (i) H2(S,Q)≅H2(S′,Q)H^2(S,\mathbb{Q})\cong H^2(S',\mathbb{Q}); (ii) h(S)≅h(S′)\mathfrak h(S)\cong\mathfrak h(S'); (iii) [S]=[S′][S]=[S'] in an appropriate localization of K0(Var⁡C)[L−1]K_0(\operatorname{Var}_{\mathbb{C}})[\mathbb{L}^{-1}]. The paper states that this is the original version of Huybrechts' conjecture and that it is disproved there; the published version was modified.

References

Primary source

Alexander I. Efimov, “Some remarks on L-equivalence of algebraic varieties”, arXiv:1707.08997 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.