Relative Humphreys conjecture for antispherical cells

At least 8 years old · documented by

Let GG, G1G_1, WW, fWf{}^{\mathrm{f}}W^{\mathrm{f}}, Cp\mathcal{C}_p, ιk\iota_{\Bbbk}, and the corresponding nilpotent orbit Oc(w)C\mathscr{O}^{\mathbb{C}}_{\mathbf{c}(w)} be as in the paper. For w∈fWfw\in{}^{\mathrm{f}}W^{\mathrm{f}}, let V‾G1(T(w⋅p0))\overline{V}_{G_1}(\mathsf{T}(w\cdot_p0)) denote the relevant reduced support variety. Relative Humphreys conjecture. For every w∈fWfw\in{}^{\mathrm{f}}W^{\mathrm{f}},

V‾G1(T(w⋅p0))=ιk(Oc(w)C)‾.\overline{V}_{G_1}(\mathsf{T}(w\cdot_p0))=\overline{\iota_{\Bbbk}(\mathscr{O}^{\mathbb{C}}_{\mathbf{c}(w)})}.

This is presented as a relative version of the regular Humphreys conjecture, relating support varieties of tilting modules indexed by doubly minimal affine Weyl-group elements to nilpotent-orbit closures. The source does not provide a resolution status for this relative statement.

References

Primary source

Pramod N. Achar, William Hardesty and Simon Riche, “On the Humphreys conjecture on support varieties of tilting modules”, arXiv:1707.07740 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.