Ciocan-Fontanine–Kim wall-crossing conjecture for stable quasimaps

About 9 years old · traced to

Let YY be a complete intersection in projective space, and fix g,n≥0g,n\geq 0. Denote by [M‾g,nϵ(Y,β)]vir[\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\epsilon}_{g,n}(Y,\beta)]^{\mathrm{vir}} and [M‾g,n∞(Y,β)]vir[\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\infty}_{g,n}(Y,\beta)]^{\mathrm{vir}} the virtual classes of the moduli spaces of ϵ\epsilon-stable and ∞\infty-stable quasimaps, respectively. Let μβϵ(z)\mu^{\epsilon}_{\beta}(z) be the relevant coefficients of the II-function, let bβ⃗b_{\vec{\beta}} convert marked points to basepoints, and let cc be the contraction morphism from ∞\infty-stable to ϵ\epsilon-stable quasimaps.

Ciocan-Fontanine–Kim wall-crossing conjecture.

∑βqβ[M‾g,nϵ(Y,β)]vir=∑β0,β1,…,βkqβ0k!bβ⃗∗c∗(∏i=1kqβiev⁡n+i∗(μβiϵ(−ψn+i))∩[M‾g,n+k∞(Y,β0)]vir).\sum_{\beta}q^{\beta}[\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\epsilon}_{g,n}(Y,\beta)]^{\mathrm{vir}}=\sum_{\beta_0,\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_k}\frac{q^{\beta_0}}{k!}b_{\vec{\beta}*}c_*\left(\prod_{i=1}^kq^{\beta_i}\operatorname{ev}_{n+i}^*(\mu^{\epsilon}_{\beta_i}(-\psi_{n+i}))\cap[\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\infty}_{g,n+k}(Y,\beta_0)]^{\mathrm{vir}}\right).

This conjecture describes the change in quasimap theory as the stability parameter crosses walls and is intended to relate stable-quasimap and Gromov–Witten theories through the ϵ\epsilon-wall-crossing. It was formulated in all genus; the supplied source gives no resolution status for this precise statement.

References

Primary source

Emily Clader, Felix Janda and Yongbin Ruan, “Higher-genus wall-crossing in the gauged linear sigma model”, arXiv:1706.05038 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.