The correspondence between type-theoretic and Grothendieck–Maltsiniotis c9-categories

A type-theoretic ω\omega-category is a model of the type theory defined in the paper, while a Grothendieck–Maltsiniotis ω\omega-category is a functor C:TopSetC:\mathcal{T}^{\operatorname{op}}\to\operatorname{Set} whose opposite preserves globular sums, where T\mathcal{T} is the canonical coherator. Correspondence conjecture. Type-theoretic ω\omega-categories correspond precisely to Grothendieck–Maltsiniotis ω\omega-categories. The claim is the semantic form of the proposed comparison between the type-theoretic models and Maltsiniotis's definition; the source explicitly says that a detailed comparison remains future work.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Eric Finster and Samuel Mimram, “A Type-Theoretical Definition of Weak ω-Categories”, arXiv:1706.02866 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.