Lapid's conjecture on parabolic Kazhdan--Lusztig polynomials

From papers

Let Pu,wP_{u,w} be the Kazhdan--Lusztig polynomials for symmetric groups, and let HSm××SmH\simeq S_m\times\dots\times S_m be the parabolic subgroup of SmnS_{mn} of type (m,,m)(m,\dots,m). For wSnw\in S_n, let w~Smn\widetilde w\in S_{mn} be defined by w~(mij)=mw(i)j\widetilde w(mi-j)=mw(i)-j for i=1,,ni=1,\dots,n and j=0,,m1j=0,\dots,m-1. Write

uHsgnuPx~u,w~=q(m2)((w)(x))P~x,w(m).\sum_{u\in H}\operatorname{sgn} u\,P_{\widetilde xu,\widetilde w}=q^{{m\choose 2}(\ell(w)-\ell(x))}\widetilde P^{(m)}_{x,w}.

For any x,wSnx,w\in S_n with xwx\le w, Lapid's conjecture. The polynomial P~x,w(m)\widetilde P^{(m)}_{x,w} satisfies all of the following: it is a polynomial rather than a Laurent polynomial; P~x,w(m)(0)=1\widetilde P^{(m)}_{x,w}(0)=1; P~x,w(m)=P~xs,w(m)\widetilde P^{(m)}_{x,w}=\widetilde P^{(m)}_{xs,w} for every simple reflection ss of SnS_n such that ws<wws<w; and

degP~x,w(m)=mdegPx,w.\deg\widetilde P^{(m)}_{x,w}=m\deg P_{x,w}.

In particular, P~x,w(m)=1\widetilde P^{(m)}_{x,w}=1 if and only if Px,w=1P_{x,w}=1. The conjecture was motivated by representation-theoretic irreducibility results and computer calculations concerning parabolic Kazhdan--Lusztig polynomials. It was verified numerically when nm12nm\le 12 and proved in the paper for m=2m=2 when ww is a Coxeter element of SnS_n or of a parabolic subgroup; the general conjecture remains open in the supplied text.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Erez Lapid, “Conjectures about certain parabolic Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials”, arXiv:1705.06517 (2018).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.