Modularity conjecture for rigid Calabi–Yau threefolds

About 23 years old · traced to

Recall that a smooth, projective threefold XX is a Calabi–Yau threefold if its canonical bundle is trivial and H1(X,OX)=H2(X,OX)=0H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X})=H^{2}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X})=0. It is rigid if H1(X,TX)=0H^{1}(X,\mathcal{T}_{X})=0. For a rigid Calabi–Yau threefold defined over Q\mathbb{Q}, let L(X,s)L(X,s) denote its LL-series.

Modularity conjecture. Any rigid Calabi–Yau threefold XX defined over Q\mathbb{Q} is modular: its LL-series L(X,s)L(X,s) coincides up to finitely many Euler factors with the Mellin transform L(f,s)L(f,s) of a modular cusp form ff of weight 44 with respect to Γ0(N)\Gamma_{0}(N), where the level NN is only divisible by the primes of bad reduction.

This conjecture predicts that arithmetic data from rigid Calabi–Yau threefolds over Q\mathbb{Q} are governed by weight-44 modular forms. The paper constructs examples realizing some new weight-44 cusp forms, while the general modularity assertion remains open.

References

Primary source

Dominik Burek, “Rigid realizations of modular forms in Calabi–Yau threefolds”, arXiv:1705.04059 (2017).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2003–2017). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:math/0304434.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.