The ADE instanton quantum field theory action conjecture

Let XMX_M be the resolution of the AM1A_{M-1} singularity, and let Oc,λ1,,λM1(XM)\mathscr O_{c,\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_{M-1}}(X_M) be its family of deformation-quantizations. Let UQFT(glNOc,λ1,,λM1(XM))U^{QFT}_\hbar(\mathfrak{gl}_N\otimes\mathscr O_{c,\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_{M-1}}(X_M)) be the deformation obtained by Koszul duality from the five-dimensional field theory. Let XNX_N be the resolution of the AN1A_{N-1} singularity. ADE instanton action conjecture. The algebra

UQFT(glNOc,λ1,,λM1(XM))U^{QFT}_\hbar(\mathfrak{gl}_N\otimes\mathscr O_{c,\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_{M-1}}(X_M))

acts on the equivariant cohomology of quasi-maps from P1\mathbb P^1 to the moduli of rank-MM instantons on XNX_N. The parameters \hbar and cc are equivariant parameters for rotations of C×XN\mathbb C\times X_N preserving the Calabi–Yau structure, while the λi\lambda_i rotate the framing at infinity. This conjecture predicts a broader ADE-level action generalizing the preceding categorified Donaldson–Thomas constructions; its validity is left open in the supplied text.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kevin Costello, “Holography and Koszul duality: the example of the M2 brane”, arXiv:1705.02500 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.