The X = M conjecture for tensor products of Kirillov–Reshetikhin crystals

Let BB be a tensor product of Kirillov--Reshetikhin crystals of type g\mathfrak{g}. For a classical weight λ\lambda, let X(B,λ;q)X(B,\lambda;q) be the one-dimensional sum over classically highest weight elements and let M(B,λ;q)M(B,\lambda;q) be the fermionic formula over BB-configurations. X=MX=M conjecture.

X(B,λ;q)=M(B,λ;q).X(B,\lambda;q)=M(B,\lambda;q).

The identity connects statistical-mechanical one-dimensional sums with fermionic rigged-configuration formulas. It is known in many cases, but the statement as given for tensor products of KR crystals in arbitrary type is not resolved by the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Travis Scrimshaw, “Uniform description of the rigged configuration bijection”, arXiv:1703.08945 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.