The X = M conjecture for tensor products of Kirillov–Reshetikhin crystals

About 9 years old · traced to

Let BB be a tensor product of Kirillov--Reshetikhin crystals of type g\mathfrak{g}. For a classical weight λ\lambda, let X(B,λ;q)X(B,\lambda;q) be the one-dimensional sum over classically highest weight elements and let M(B,λ;q)M(B,\lambda;q) be the fermionic formula over BB-configurations. X=MX=M conjecture.

X(B,λ;q)=M(B,λ;q).X(B,\lambda;q)=M(B,\lambda;q).

The identity connects statistical-mechanical one-dimensional sums with fermionic rigged-configuration formulas. It is known in many cases, but the statement as given for tensor products of KR crystals in arbitrary type is not resolved by the source.

References

Primary source

Travis Scrimshaw, “Uniform description of the rigged configuration bijection”, arXiv:1703.08945 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.