Stable-pairs descendent correspondence for relative 3-folds

About 9 years old · traced to

Let X/DX/D be a relative 33-fold, let β\beta be a curve class, let μ\mu be a relative boundary condition, and let γi∈H∗(X)\gamma_i\in H^*(X). The barred relative descendent insertion is defined using the correspondence matrix with the substitution ci=ci(TX[−D])c_i=c_i(T_X[-D]). Relative stable-pairs descendent correspondence conjecture. Under the variable change −q=eiu-q=e^{iu},

(−q)−dβ/2ZP(X/D;q ∣τα1−1(γ1)⋯ταℓ−1(γℓ) ∣ μ)β=(−iu)dβ+ℓ(μ)−∣μ∣ZGW′(X/D;u ∣τa1−1(γ1)⋯ταℓ−1(γℓ)‾ ∣ μ)β.(-q)^{-d_\beta/2}\mathsf Z_{\mathsf P}\Big(X/D;q\ \Big|\tau_{\alpha_1-1}(\gamma_1)\cdots\tau_{\alpha_\ell-1}(\gamma_\ell)\ \Big|\ \mu\Big)_\beta=(-iu)^{d_\beta+\ell(\mu)-|\mu|}\mathsf Z'_{\mathsf{GW}}\Big(X/D;u\ \Big|\overline{\tau_{a_1-1}(\gamma_1)\cdots\tau_{\alpha_\ell-1}(\gamma_\ell)}\ \Big|\ \mu\Big)_\beta.

The statement extends the absolute descendent correspondence to relative geometries; the supplied text does not report a general proof.

References

Primary source

Rahul Pandharipande, “Descendents for stable pairs on 3-folds”, arXiv:1703.01747 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.