Extrapolated tiling counts for 2s×(2s+2)2s\times(2s+2) rectangles

From papers

Let Tn×m(s,k)T_{n\times m}(s,k) denote the number of ways to tile an n×mn\times m rectangle using s×ss\times s squares and 1×11\times1 squares, with exactly kk squares of size s×ss\times s. For s>2s>2, the extrapolated tiling-count conjecture.

T2s×(2s+2)(s,2)=3+18s+7s2.T_{2s\times(2s+2)}(s,2)=3+18s+7s^2. T2s×(2s+2)(s,3)=8+40s.T_{2s\times(2s+2)}(s,3)=8+40s. T2s×(2s+2)(s,4)=36.T_{2s\times(2s+2)}(s,4)=36.

These formulas are extrapolated from the computed database of tilings; their general validity is not established in the supplied text.

Progress summary

Open

The proposed formulas remain unproved, with no public counterexample or verification found.

The conjecture predicts three exact counting formulas for tilings of a rectangle with side lengths 2s2s and 2s+22s+2, using exactly 22, 33, or 44 large squares, for s>2s>2. The cited paper presents them as extrapolations from computed data rather than established results.

Current status (as of August 2026): The three formulas remain conjectures based on computation; no proof, counterexample, or independent verification is recorded in the retrieved sources.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Richard J. Mathar, “Tiling n X m rectangles with 1 X 1 and s X s squares”, arXiv:1609.03964 (2016).

Solutions 1

Proof

In fact, both families of conjectures follow from the following uniform enumeration. Let 0t<s0\le t<s and put

B=(t+22).B=\binom{t+2}{2}.

Then

T2s×(2s+t)(s,2)=(s+t+1)2+B((s+1)22),T2s×(2s+t)(s,3)=2B(s+t+1)+(s1)(t+1)(t+2)(2t+3)3,T2s×(2s+t)(s,4)=B2.\begin{aligned} T_{2s\times(2s+t)}(s,2)&=(s+t+1)^2+B((s+1)^2-2),\\ T_{2s\times(2s+t)}(s,3)&=2B(s+t+1)+(s-1)\frac{(t+1)(t+2)(2t+3)}3,\\ T_{2s\times(2s+t)}(s,4)&=B^2. \end{aligned}

A large square is determined by its upper-left corner (r,c)(r,c), where 0rs0\le r\le s and 0cs+t0\le c\le s+t. Two such squares are disjoint precisely when

rrsorccs.|r-r'|\ge s\quad\text{or}\quad |c-c'|\ge s.

Vertical separation is therefore possible only between boundary rows 00 and ss. The number of unordered column pairs with separation at least ss is

d=ss+t(s+t+1d)=(t+22)=B.\sum_{d=s}^{s+t}(s+t+1-d)=\binom{t+2}{2}=B.

Moreover, since s+t<2ss+t<2s, three pairwise horizontally separated squares cannot occur.

For two squares, vertically separated pairs contribute (s+t+1)2(s+t+1)^2. For each of the BB horizontally separated column pairs there are (s+1)2(s+1)^2 ordered row choices, exactly two of which were already counted vertically. This gives the first formula.

For three squares supported entirely on boundary rows, choose which row carries two squares, its separated column pair, and the opposite-row column. This gives 2B(s+t+1)2B(s+t+1). Otherwise exactly one square occupies an interior row. For its column cc, write

q(c)=#{d{0,,s+t}:dcs}.q(c)=\#\{d\in\{0,\ldots,s+t\}:|d-c|\ge s\}.

All such columns lie on one side of cc and have mutual separation less than ss, so the remaining two squares must occupy the two different boundary rows. Their columns can be chosen independently in q(c)2q(c)^2 ways. The nonzero values of q(c)q(c) are t+1,t,,1t+1,t,\ldots,1 at one end and 1,,t,t+11,\ldots,t,t+1 at the other, whence

cq(c)2=2j=1t+1j2=(t+1)(t+2)(2t+3)3.\sum_cq(c)^2=2\sum_{j=1}^{t+1}j^2=\frac{(t+1)(t+2)(2t+3)}3.

There are s1s-1 interior rows, proving the second formula.

For four squares, an interior-row square can coexist with at most two others. Thus all four lie on the boundary rows, with exactly two on each row. The separated column pair on each boundary row can be chosen independently, yielding B2B^2.

Taking t=2t=2, so B=6B=6, gives exactly

T2s×(2s+2)(s,2)=7s2+18s+3,T2s×(2s+2)(s,3)=40s+8,T2s×(2s+2)(s,4)=36T_{2s\times(2s+2)}(s,2)=7s^2+18s+3,\quad T_{2s\times(2s+2)}(s,3)=40s+8,\quad T_{2s\times(2s+2)}(s,4)=36

for every s>2s>2. The same theorem with t=1t=1 also gives 4s2+10s+14s^2+10s+1, 16s+216s+2, and 99, settling the companion formulas for 2s×(2s+1)2s\times(2s+1) rectangles.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·