Quasimap I-function conjecture for the Gromov–Witten Lagrangian cone

Let E\sslashGE\sslash \textbf{G} be the relevant GIT quotient, let I(t,z)I(\mathbf{t},z) be the quasimap I-function, let PQ(t,z)P^Q(\mathbf{t},z) be the corresponding quasimap input, and let P(t,z)P(\mathbf{t},z) and τ(t)\tau(\mathbf{t}) be the power-series element and change of variables constructed in the paper. Let StQ(z)S^Q_{\mathbf{t}}(z) and St(z)S_{\mathbf{t}}(z) denote the quasimap and Gromov–Witten S-operators. Quasimap I-function conjecture.

I(t,z)=StQ(z)(PQ(t,z))=Sτ(t)(z)(P(τ(t),z)).I(\mathbf{t},z)=S^Q_{\mathbf{t}}(z)(P^Q(\mathbf{t},z))=S_{\tau(\mathbf{t})}(z)(P(\tau(\mathbf{t}),z)).

In particular, II lies on the Lagrangian cone of the Gromov–Witten theory of E\sslashGE\sslash \textbf{G}. The surrounding argument constructs PP and τ\tau inductively to establish the stated identity, so the conjectural content is the resulting cone property and its interpretation as a quasimap/Gromov–Witten comparison.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jeongseok Oh, “Quasimaps to GIT fiber bundles and applications”, arXiv:1607.08326 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.