Integral commutativity conjectures for categorical induction and restriction functors

About 11 years old · traced to

Let RR be the integral coefficient ring, let R‾\overline R be the corresponding coefficient ring for the construction with ee replaced by e+1e+1, and let Oμ,Rν,ΔO^{\nu,\Delta}_{\mu,R} denote the indicated subcategories. Use the equivalences θμμ‾\theta_\mu^{\overline\mu} and θμ‾′μ′\theta_{\overline\mu'}^{\mu'} described in the source, and write μ‾0\overline\mu^0 and μ′\mu' for the intermediate and target weights occurring in the diagrams. The integral commutativity conjectures. The two displayed diagrams involving F‾k,F‾k+1,Fk\overline F_k,\overline F_{k+1},F_k and E‾k,E‾k+1,Ek\overline E_k,\overline E_{k+1},E_k, respectively, are commutative. These integral statements refine the preceding comparison to the categories Oμ,Rν,ΔO^{\nu,\Delta}_{\mu,R} and are motivated by the construction of the equivalences over a field and their integral version; the supplied text does not state whether they have been proved.

References

Primary source

Ruslan Maksimau, “Categorical representations, KLR algebras and Koszul duality”, arXiv:1512.04878 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.