Weighted-network formula for tropical determinantal valuations

Let x1,x2,x3x_1,x_2,x_3 be points in the affine Grassmannian, and let ωi,ωj,ωk\omega_i,\omega_j,\omega_k be fundamental weights of SLnSL_n with i+j+k=ni+j+k=n. For points p,qp,q in the affine Grassmannian, let d(p,q)d(p,q) be the coweight-valued distance, and let fijktf_{ijk}^t denote the tropicalized canonical function. Weighted-network conjecture. For a positive configuration of points, one has

fijkt(x1,x2,x3)=minp{ωid(p,x1)+ωjd(p,x2)+ωkd(p,x3)},f_{ijk}^t(x_1,x_2,x_3)=\min_p\left\{\omega_i\cdot d(p,x_1)+\omega_j\cdot d(p,x_2)+\omega_k\cdot d(p,x_3)\right\},

where the minimum is over all pp in the affine Grassmannian. This is the weak form; the strong form asserts the same formula for any configuration of points. The formula would give a geometric interpretation of the tropicalized canonical functions and hence of intersection pairings between higher laminations. The paper notes that one inequality is immediate, that the conjecture holds when one of i,j,ki,j,k is zero, and that it is true for SL2SL_2 and asymptotically; the general assertion remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ian Le and Evan O'Dorney, “Geometry of Positive Configurations in Affine Buildings”, arXiv:1511.00165 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.